arXiv.org putting the 2nd ITPR of the Rossi E-cat on hold…

Apparently arXiv.org have put the second independent third party report on hold for unknown reasons (insert favourite pet theory here).  It shows an undeniable COP of 3,2-3.6 over a 32 day period and substantial isostope changes in nickel and lithium. Anyway here it is for those interested.

LuganoReportSubmit

 

7 thoughts on “arXiv.org putting the 2nd ITPR of the Rossi E-cat on hold…

  1. Emissivity of materials is subject to large uncertainties. Better science is to put this generator in a insulated, water cooled box and measure delta-T and flow on the cooling water. That can be done extremely accurately without any assumptions.

    • Well, there are outher ways to meassure, but even the moste intense critics (like Ekström) of Rossi says that this an issue. The method is robust.

  2. The burning process changes the fuel at the nuclear level with a Li-depletion. (page 28-29) Have they tried to balance that with addition of some % of He to make a natural ”ladder” for Ni transmutation? Just a hint.

  3. I have read the paper, and one point is for me not clear:
    The reactor was started with 810W power, then it started to produce more than 1600W. Then they increased input power to 910 and the reactor produced 2300W and more.

    The reactor was producing much more power than it was needed to activate the reaction.

    Why is then the system unable to sustain itself?
    Why when the 910W have been removed the system cooled even if it was producing 2300W ?

    • @Roberto Gardi: Because the reactor needs electricity to keep running, it cannot use its own heat to sustain the reaction, that is a different kind of energy. And in order to change the energy in forms of heat to electricity you’ll need a thermoelectric generator, their typical efficiencies are around 5–8%, therefore you cannot use its own heat to sustain the reaction. You could say this device is just a battery which needs electricity as input and outputs heat for a certain ammount of time. An application could be efficient home heating with electricity, as long as the battery/reactor is not too high priced and easy to replace with a new one after it has done its work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>